Political Calculations
Unexpectedly Intriguing!
20 November 2025
Empty Storage Container photo by Moj Box on Unsplash - https://unsplash.com/photos/a-room-with-a-lot-of-storage-containers-in-it-Kd-YlHSvS-o

After a strong rebound in July, the combined value of goods traded between the U.S. and China dipped in August 2025. The release of trade data for this month was delayed until 19 November 2025 because of the record 43-day shutdown of nonessential U.S. government functions that ended last week.

Exports from the U.S. to China totaled $8.272 billion, which were down 11% from July's level and down nearly 37% year-over-year. Imported goods shipped from China to the U.S. totaled $25.133 billion, which were down nearly 5% month-over-month and about 31% since August 2024.

The combined value of trade between the U.S. and China for August 2025 is $33.1 billion, a 6.5% decrease from July's showing.

The trailing twelve month average of the combined total of goods exchanged between the U.S. and China continued falling in August. It now falls 15.3% below a counterfactual projection of how the value of trade between the two nations would have grown in the absence of the global tariff war. The following chart presents the monthly data for the combined value of goods exchanged between the U.S. and China. It also presents the trailing twelve month average, which smooths out much of the year-to-year seasonal variation in the trade data in the period from January 2017 through August 2025.

Combined Value of U.S. Exports to China and U.S. Imports from China, January 2017 - August 2025

On 1 November 2025, the U.S. and China struck a new truce in their tariff war that lowered tariffs considerably more than their 28 June deal, though we won't see its effect in the data until November 2025's data becomes available early in 2026. In the meantime, we anticipate we'll continue tracking an overall downward trend in trade between the U.S. and China until the trade between the two countries following the deal starts to gain traction.

References

U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services (FT900). U.S. Trade in Goods with China, Not Seasonally Adjusted, Nominal Figures, Total Census Basis. [Online database]. Accessed 19 November 2025.

Image credit: Empty Storage Container photo by Moj Box on Unsplash.

Labels:

19 November 2025
A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it (and 'Dividends' above it) - Image generated by Microsoft Copilot Designer.

The S&P 500's dividend outlook for the final quarter of 2025 brightened in the month since our last snapshot of their outlook.

On 15 October 2025, the CME Group's S&P 500 Quarterly Dividend Index' Futures quotes indicated investors could expect to collect $19.90 per share during the period covered by 2025-Q4 dividend futures contracts. On Friday, 14 November 2025, that rose to $19.94 per share, an increase of 0.2% from the previous month's outlook.

Our October 2025 snapshot also presented the projections for the S&P 500's dividends per share through the second quarter of 2026. Here is how the dividends expected in the future quarters of 2026-Q1 and 2026-Q2 changed in the past month:

  • 2026-Q1: Decrease of $0.01, dipping to $20.89 per share
  • 2026-Q2: Increase of $0.02, rising to $19.73 per share

For this dividend snapshot, we're extending the outlook for the S&P 500's expected dividends per share through the fourth quarter of 2026. The following chart presents the S&P 500's quarterly dividends per share as provided by dividend futures contracts from 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q4.

Monthly Snapshot of Past and Projected Future for the S&P 500's Quarterly Dividends per Share, 2024-Q1 through 2026-Q4, Snapshot on 14 November 2025

A note of caution on the dividend projection for 2026-Q4. Because it covers expectations that are currently more than four quarters into the future, it's best understood as an initial projection based on very thin trading at this point of time. The projection for this quarter can be expected to change once it falls within the typical year-ahead period that defines the typical time horizon for investors and the investment activity for its related dividend futures contract picks up.

More About Dividend Futures Data

How changes in the outlook for dividends at specific points of time in the future contribute to changes in stock prices is described by this math.

For this series, we have been taking a snapshot of the CME Group's S&P 500 quarterly dividend futures data shortly after the second or third week of each month.

Dividend futures indicate the amount of dividends per share to be paid out over the period covered by each quarter's dividend futures contracts, which start on the day after the preceding quarter's dividend futures contracts expire and end on the third Friday of the month ending the indicated quarter. As determined by dividend futures contracts, the now "current" quarter of 2025-Q4 began on Saturday, 20 September 2025 and will end on Friday, 19 December 2025. From the perspective of dividend futures, the next quarter of 2026-Q1 will begin on Saturday, 22 December 2025.

Because dividend futures are tied to options contracts that run on this schedule, that makes these figures different from the quarterly dividends per share figures that are reported by Standard and Poor. S&P reports the amount of dividends per share paid out during regular calendar quarters after the end of each quarter. This term mismatch accounts for the differences in dividends reported by both sources, with the biggest differences between the two typically seen in the first and fourth quarters of each year.

Image Credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it". And 'Dividends' written above it, which we added.

Labels: , ,

18 November 2025
A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it (and 'Earnings' above it) - Image generated by Microsoft Copilot Designer.

Every three months, we take a snapshot of the expectations for future earnings in the S&P 500 (Index: SPX) at approximately the midpoint of the current quarter, shortly after most U.S. firms have announced their previous quarter's earnings.

For Fall 2025, our snapshot was taken on 12 November 2025, 91 days after the Summer 2025 snapshot. The outlook for earnings improved since last quarter's snapshot, continuing a positive trend since Spring 2025.

The current projection for the S&P 500's earnings per share through the end of 2025 is $244.51, which would represent a 16.3% year-over-year gain over December 2024's finalized earnings of $210.17.

The following chart, covering how earnings expectations have changed from the end of 2021 through 12 November 2025:

Forecasts for S&P 500 Trailing Twelve Month Earnings per Share, December 2021-December 2026, Snapshot on 12 November 2025

Looking further forward through the end of 2026, Standard & Poor projects the S&P 500's earnings will be $281.78 per share. If this projection holds, it would represent a little over a 15% year-over-year increase over the current earnings projection for 2025.

But will it hold? There's a lot of time between now and the end of December 2026 and if there's one thing the chart makes clear, it's very unlikely the earnings recorded then will match what they were projected to be four quarters earlier!

Reference

Silverblatt, Howard. Standard & Poor. S&P 500 Earnings and Estimates. [Excel Spreadsheet]. 12 November 2025. Accessed 15 November 2025.

Image Credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "A crystal ball with the word 'SP 500' written inside it". And 'Earnings' written above it, which we added.

Labels: , ,

17 November 2025
An editorial cartoon showing Federal Reserve officials in suits carrying football goalposts labeled 'RATE CUT' away from a Wall Street bull wearing a football uniform and preparing to kick a field goal, who looks frustrated as the goalposts are being moved further away. Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Designer.

The S&P 500 (Index: SPX) saw very little change week over week. The index closed the trading week ending on 14 November 2025 at 6,734.11, up less than 0.1% from its previous week's close.

There was more action than that during the week. The index rose early in the week by 1.75% as AI-related firms jumped only to give nearly all of its gain back by the end of the week. The main culprits behind that disappointing development were a number of Federal Reserve officials who signaled on Thursday, 13 November 2025 they are unlikely to cut the Federal Funds Rate again next month. That impacted the direction of stock prices because it prompted investors to revisit their expectations for the mega-caps funding their AI-technology infrastructure plans using debt, several of which represent some of the biggest firms within the S&P 500.

The CME Group's FedWatch Tool absorbed that new information and changed to indicate just a 44% probability of one more quarter point cut to the Federal Funds Rate in 2025. In 2026, the FedWatch tool anticipates better than 50% probabilities for quarter point rate cuts on 28 January (2026-Q1), 17 June (2026-Q1), and 16 September (2026-Q3). The potential timing of all these projected rate cuts remains very fluid with substantial changes in expectations from week to week.

Meanwhile, the latest update of the alternative futures chart shows investors focused most their forward-looking attention on the current quarter of 2025-Q4 in the latter part of the week, which is consistent with the now open question of whether or not the Fed will cut rates in December 2025.

Alternative Futures - S&P 500 - 2025Q4 - Standard Model (m=-2.0 from 28 Apr 2025) - Snapshot on 14 Nov 2025

Here are the week's market-moving headlines:

Monday, 10 November 2025
Tuesday, 11 November 2025
Wednesday, 12 November 2025
Thursday, 13 November 2025
Friday, 14 November 2025

The end of the federal government shutdown had very little impact on stock prices. That's an expected outcome because most political events that don't involve changes in tax rates tend to contribute little more than noise to markets. That doesn't mean it won't have an economic impact, because of its length and because it began to disrupt air transportation with air traffic controllers not showing up for work at major airports after a month of going unpaid.

We don't know yet how big that impact might be. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool projection of real GDP growth in the U.S. during the recently ended 2025-Q3 was unchanged at +4.0%, as many economic data reports remain on hold with the government slowly resuming operations after the Senate Democrats' failed shutdown. The BEA's official estimates of GDP in 2025-Q3 remain on hold as well. And for that matter, 2025-Q4, which is when any actual economic contraction related to the shutdown occurred.

Image credit: Microsoft Copilot Designer. Prompt: "An editorial cartoon showing Federal Reserve officials in suits carrying football goalposts labeled 'RATE CUT' away from a Wall Street bull wearing a football uniform and preparing to kick a field goal, who looks frustrated as the goalposts are being moved further away"

Labels: ,

14 November 2025
Art Gallery Problem sample with 4 cameras by Rocchini on Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Art_gallery_problem.svg

Imagine you're in charge of placing security cameras inside a gallery filled with valuable objects. Your boss is willing to pay to put in as many cameras at it will take to protect the gallery's contents, provided you meet two conditions:

  1. The cameras must collectively provide 100% visual coverage of the entire area of the gallery.
  2. You have to determine the minimum number of cameras that will be needed to do the job.

Believe it or not, this is a famous 50-year old geometry problem that's known as the art gallery problem. In the following 50-minute video, CC Academy describes how the problem can be solved using graph theory for any strangely shaped floorplan:

Kit Yates discusses why the recent heist of the French royal jewels from the Louvre Museum in Paris brings home the importance of this geometry problem:

At a hearing in front of the French Senate in the immediate aftermath of the robbery, Laurence des Cars, the director of the world famous museum, admitted that the museum had "failed to protect" the crown jewels. She admitted that the only camera covering the balcony the thieves used was facing the wrong way and a preliminary report revealed one in three rooms in the Denon wing where the thieves struck had no security cameras. More generally Des Cars acknowledged that cuts in surveillance and security staff had left the museum vulnerable and insisted that the Louvre's security system must be reinforced to "look everywhere".

Alarms at the museum apparently sounded as they should, according to the French culture ministry. Yet it is the third high profile theft from French museums in two months, which have left the ministry implementing new security plans across France.

As they should, if for no other reason than because their security scheme has been shown to have gaping holes that thieves an easily drive a Böcker Agilo truck-mounted moving lift through.

But more to the point, had those responsible for overseeing the Louvre's security solved their specific version of the art gallery problem, the thieves' plans might have been thwarted. Yates concisely explains how to quickly determine how many cameras you might need using only geometric principles:

The answer, it turns out, depends on the number of corners (or, as mathematicians call them, "vertices"), as there will be as many walls as there are corners in a room. Some simple division helps us work out how many cameras are needed.

By dividing the number of corners in a room by three, that will tell us how many cameras are needed to cover it, assuming they have a full 360 degree field of view....

This even works if the number of corners isn't neatly divisible by three. For a 20-sided gallery, for example, the answer works out at six and two thirds. In these cases you can take the whole number – so we'd never need more than six cameras in a 20-sided room.

Yates continues by getting into the graph theory that tells where those 360-degree view cameras can then be optimally placed.

In 1978 Steve Fisk, a mathematics professor at Bowdoin college in Maine, US, came up with a proof – considered one of the most elegant in all of mathematics – of this lower limit on the number of cameras needed.

His strategy was to divide the gallery up into triangles (check out the left image of the figure below). He then proved that you can pick just three colours – say red, yellow and blue – and assign a different colour to the corners of each triangle. This would mean that every triangle in your gallery has a different colour in its three corners (See the right image of the figure below for an example). This is known as "three-colouring" the corners.

Triangles are one of those "convex" polygons we mentioned earlier, so a camera positioned at any corner (or indeed anywhere in the triangle) can see every point in that shape. Every triangle has corners with each of the three colours. That means you can pick just one of the colours and place cameras at those positions. Those cameras will be able to see every part of every triangle, and hence every part of the gallery. But here's the best part.

The beauty of Fisk's proof is you can just choose the colour with the fewest dots, and you'll still cover the whole gallery. In the 15-sided shape above, by choosing the red dots, we can get away with only four cameras.

What are the chances that all of France's art gallery security problems are now homework assignments for the country's undergraduate math students taking courses in either geometry or graph theory?

Image credit: Art Gallery Problem sample with 4 cameras by Rocchini on Wikimedia Commons Creative Commons CC BY 3.0 Attribution 3.0 Unported Deed.

Labels: ,

About Political Calculations

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

ironman at politicalcalculations

Thanks in advance!

Recent Posts

Indices, Futures, and Bonds

Closing values for previous trading day.

Most Popular Posts
Quick Index

Site Data

This site is primarily powered by:

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

CSS Validation

Valid CSS!

RSS Site Feed

AddThis Feed Button

JavaScript

The tools on this site are built using JavaScript. If you would like to learn more, one of the best free resources on the web is available at W3Schools.com.

Other Cool Resources

Blog Roll

Market Links

Useful Election Data
Charities We Support
Shopping Guides
Recommended Reading
Recently Shopped

Seeking Alpha Certified

Archives